KUALA LUMPUR, Oct 1 – The trial judge in Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak’s 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) case on Tuesday questioned the defence team about the distinction between the former premier’s personal expenses and those for political purposes.
Judge Datuk Collin Lawrence Sequerah posed the question to Najib’s lead counsel, Tan Sri Muhammad Shafee Abdullah during his submission at the close of the prosecution’s case at the High Court here.
Judge Sequerah: (Is there) any difference between spending for political and personal usage?
Muhammad Shafee: We have proved that 99 per cent of the money in his account was not used for his personal purpose, for instance, he didn’t buy a private plane or treat everybody with champagne in a New York bar, or something like that.
“My Lord, I have to use this word; it is against the pathology of corruption, that a person took this money and spent it not for personal use, but for the benefit of the public,” he contended, adding that Najib had used RM300 million from 1MDB for the 2013 general election.
At this juncture, Judge Sequerah questioned the veteran counsel if there were any case law to back his argument.
In response, Muhammad Shafee said that “it is an inference of facts” and that there is no case quite like Najib’s 1MDB case, setting it apart from any precedent.
The judge then asked for the prosecution’s comment on the matter and deputy public prosecutor (DPP) Kamal Bahrin Omar replied that they are only concerned with the fact that the alleged funds, which entered Najib’s accounts – came from illegal proceeds.
Fellow DPP Ahmad Akram Gharib added that it did not matter whether Najib used the purported funds for personal or political reasons.
“The law says that it is for his advantage,” he said.
Najib, 71, faces four charges of abusing his position to obtain RM2.3 billion from 1MDB funds at the AmIslamic Bank Berhad branch on Jalan Raja Chulan, Bukit Ceylon, between Feb 24, 2011, and Dec 19, 2014.